Over the course of the past two and a half years, ACFO-ACAF members were asked to leave behind their traditional office spaces and work remotely. As COVID restrictions continue to be gradually lifted, discussions have ramped up regarding the return to the office and what that transition will look like. We have heard our members’ frustrations around return-to-the-office mandates, more specifically about the disparity that exists between the plans from different departments.
In an effort to better understand how different departments are creating their return-to-the-office plans, and as a follow up to our telework update on September 27, we at ACFO-ACAF have collected data from members working in a variety of different departments. The data collection has provided us with a superior understanding of what telework policies are being established across the federal public service, and how much flexibility is being offered, if any. The consensus from our members is that telework is extremely important, which is why we are in constant communication with senior leaders advocating for the flexibility that our members want while also consulting on various central committees on how to facilitate hybrid work to meet operational requirements.
The following table indicates whether a department has a mandatory minimum number of days that senior management are requiring staff to work from the office. The telework policies outlined below could differ from one position and/or department to another based on operational requirements and may change as the telework landscape continues to evolve over the coming months while departments search for an optimal solution. In addition, while a department may not have a mandatory minimum number of days required by senior management, individual managers might still decide to impose minimums based on operational requirements. The telework landscape will continue to evolve over the coming months as departments determine the most optimal solution. ACFO-ACAF believes strongly that our members should have flexibility when it comes to their telework options, while also acknowledging the value of being in the office from time to time.
| Department | Mandatory minimum number of days in the office required by senior management | Comments |
| Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | No minimum | |
| Canada Border Services Agency | 1 day/week | |
| Canadian Heritage | 1 day/week | |
| Correctional Service of Canada | No minimum for NHQ | CSC regions tend to have mandatory minimum no. of days which vary |
| Department of Finance | 2 days/week | |
| Department of Fisheries and Oceans | 1 day/week | |
| Department of National Defence | No minimum | |
| Elections Canada | No minimum | |
| Employment and Social Development Canada | No minimum | |
| Environment and Climate Change Canada | No minimum | |
| Global Affairs Canada | 1 day/week | |
| Health Canada | 2 days/week | On-site presence is requested 40%-60% of the time per month |
| Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada | Twice a month | Currently twice a month, will be moving to one day/week later this fall |
| Indigenous Services Canada | 1 day/week | |
| Infrastructure Canada | 2 days/week | |
| Natural Resources Canada | 2 days/week | |
| Privy Council Office | 2 days/week | |
| Public Health Agency of Canada | 2 days/week | |
| Royal Canadian Mounted Police | No minimum | |
| Shared Services Canada | No minimum | |
| Statistics Canada | 2 days/week | |
| Transport Canada | 1 day/week | |
| Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat | 2 days/week | |
| Veterans Affairs Canada | No minimum |
ACFO-ACAF would like to thank all our members who have helped us by sharing their latest telework policies and for their continued cooperation throughout this process. We understand that the lack of clarity and flexibility being provided by the employer leaves our members and their managers with a level of uncertainty around the return to the office, which is why it’s on the forefront of our discussions with senior management.
We would also like to remind members that if they have a human rights-based accommodation requirement, such as a medical condition that puts them or their family members at greater risk of harm from the ongoing pandemic, or an accommodation requirement due to family status, they should request accommodation on those grounds. Return to work policies do not relieve the employer’s duty to accommodate to the point of undue hardship, and the employer must consider each request on an individual basis. If you require any assistance with the accommodation process, or have any other questions about your telework rights, please reach out to the ACFO-ACAF Labour Relations team at labourrelations@acfo-acaf.com.
Related
Grievance filed over new in-office policy undermining EDI
As you may know, this second week of May is the Government of Canada’s GBA Plus Awareness Week (opens in […]
Return to the office: What you need to know
As many departments have been making a transition back to the office, we’ve been receiving questions about this process to […]
Returning to the office: ESDC Telework Policy
In a letter to ACFO-ACAF President and National Joint Council Co-Chair Dany Richard in December 2021, TBS President Mona Fortier […]